2026年5月12日 星期二

HW#10 RF PA Driver Design (physics vs. closed-form)

 1. Benchmark the three designs of RF PA Drivers


Closed-form Optimizer with Load-Pull Contours 

Performance-first Thermal build  ∠Γ_3f₀ phase (deg) · open=0, -170 deg

Margin-first Thermal build ∠Γ_3f₀ phase (deg) · open=0, -170 deg


Using Cowork or Claude.ai, benchmark the three models. Experiment with 5 seeds. For each seed, optimize the circuit design using built-in A* and then NM. 
  • For each seed, record metrics from the cascaded optimizers: 
  • Compare Closed-Form vs. margin-first build vs. comprehensive model
  • -Tabulate Gain, Pout, PAE, OP1dB, S₁₁ (5 metrics × 10 seeds = 40 cells).
  • -Identify which metric the closed-form most over- or under-estimates.
  • Cross-check both thermal designs: compute junction temperature rise ΔT_j at peak Pout. Which design runs cooler? By how many °C?
  • -Build a 2×2 comparison table: rows = {Performance-first, Margin-first}, columns = {Fitness, min-spec-margin (dB), ΔT_j (°C), PAE @ 6dB back-off}.
  • Visualize all of your data

  • Supplemental

    2026年5月5日 星期二

    HW#9 RF PA Driver Design (Comparing optimization algorithms and pipelines)

     課堂練習 

    Deadline: This Saturday at 23:59

    Send all the share links to  me chang212@gmail.com by email with subject HW#9 [your id, your name]

    只要做第一題

    1. Benchmark the three algorithms (GD, NM, A*) and their cascades (one designed by you and the other design by AI )

    • For the five methods, each runs with 10 seeds
    • Tabulate Gain, Pout, PAE, OP1dB, S₁₁ (5 methods = 5 tables, each table with 5 metrics × 10 seeds = 40 cells).
    • Visualize all of your data

    Two-stage Cascode Class-AB RF PA Driver targeting 5G n78 (3.5 GHz) in TSMC 28nm RF

    Build Sub 6 GHz Power Amplifier Optimizer with Die Synced
    shareartifact (Closed-Form)

    2026年4月28日 星期二

    HW#8 Claude Cowork

     課堂練習 

    Deadline: This Saturday at 23:59

    Send all the share links to  me chang212@gmail.com by email with subject HW#8 [your id, your name]


    Part 1

    Use Claude CoWork to benchmark  BJT Differential Pair 

     1. Experiments with 30 seeds


    schematic with parameter optimizer

    2. The SA code is flawed. Therefore Ad, CMRR, PM cannot be optimized. Use Cowork to diagnose and fix the code. Rerun the bencmark.

    Hint: prompts for CoWork
    Prompts for Claude Chat


    Part 2

    Benchmark the P&R for OP 741.
    Experiment with 3 seeds
    Measure success, congestions, wirelength, overlap pairs (before/after), Vin length match